Skip to main content

Commentary: The Import of the Discovery of the New World

There are 4 major crops in the world today. Two are from the 'Old World' (rice and wheat). Two are from the 'New World' (maize/corn and potatoes). Before about 1500 nobody in Europe or Asia or Africa knew anything about corn or potatoes. They also didn't know anything about chocolate or tobacco either. And, they didn't know anything about tomatoes. These all came from the 'New World'. What would Italian food be like before they embraced tomato-based sauces? They were cheese-based before they got tomatoes from the America's. So, what we think about as so typically Italian, is a more recent concoction. Think about the Potatoes in Ireland. They got them from the America's.

How about the other way around? Think of all the thousands of miles of wheat grown in the midwest and west. These came from Europe.

What else did Europe contribute? How about disease? When Christopher Columbus arrived in the Bahamas and discovered America, there were at least 35 million Indians in the America's and quite possibly as much as 100 million. Within 50 years 85-90% of them had died due to these diseases carried over on the ships. That means between 25-90 million Indians died in 50 years, almost all of them without ever having even seen or heard of a European.

Misconception: that when the Spanish arrived in Mexico, it was because of their guns and the Inca's and Aztec beliefs that they were gods that gave them the big edge and allowed them to run rampant through them. The truth is that while there was some question of who they were and possible connection with the gods, the biggest factor affecting success for the Spanish was a combination of ferocious fighting within the tribes themselves, who were fighting over successors, and between different tribes, many of whom were victims of Aztec agression and their need to sacrifice blood to appease the gods. Couple that with disease the Spanish brought with them and the Aztec and Inca's were at a disadvantage.

Slavery: Everyone engaged in it from both sides of the Atlantic, including other Africans. Active Atlantic slave trading was engaged in for about 400 years, ending in the mid to late 19th century. When the Spanish and Portuguese came to America they conquered and acquired land. To take advantage of this land they used Indian labor to work the fields and the mines. Unfortunately, they were very vulnerable to European diseases and 85-90% of them died out very quickly. As a result, new Spanish landowners had lots of land but nobody to work it. They began using slaves from Africa as an alternative and increasingly relied on them for their labor needs. The largest number of African slaves ended up in Brazil (which used about a third of all slaves). The percentage in the United States? -- About 6%. The last country to outlaw slavery? Brazil in 1891.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eve Online - Faction Warfare Missioning

Basics: Gain ISK and LP by completing and turning in missions. Missions are against npc's (non-player "rats"). They generally involve destroying an object (like a reactor), or a head honcho rat (like a Sector Commander). With ISK you can purchase whatever you need off the Eve markets. LP you use to purchase items in your corporations Loyalty Points Store (LP = Loyalty Points). How lucrative is mission running? It depends on the tier the faction is at in the warzone. If you complete 20 missions, you should on average at Tier 3 get a payout of about 40 million ISK and 450K-550K LP. At about 700 ISK/LP that translates to about 350 mil. ISK. At Tier 4, those same missions completed should pay out 650k-850k LP. This would translate to about 550 mil. ISK. What do I use to run missions? Current doctrine suggests that if you're Amarr fighting against Minmatar, the best ship to use on Level 3 and 4 missions is a Stealth Bomber called the Hound . You can stay at range

Why the world doesn't need Superman

When you read a romantic novel, or watch a blockbuster movie, or even something as mundane as a soap opera, the girl always gets her man. She always leaves another man, less worthy than this Superman. He invariably beat her, or never had time for his kids because he was too busy with his job, or carried on affairs with someone from his office, or any one of a dozen or so standard reasons. But, she leaves him because she found her true love, her Super Man. In any case there is this unworthy ex that we as the audience find despicable in some way so that her leaving him is justified and the right thing to do. This is a metaphor, of course, but what happens to all those unworthy ? Are they as bad as all that, or do they just serve as a mechanism that allows the plot to permit this behavior of hers? So who are these nameless unworthy ? In fact they do have names and personalities, and I'd wager they are not quit as bad as made out. Why? Because I am one of these, and as a member of t

Commentary: Religion - Why it's hard for me to Believe

1. I have been ernest many times in my pleas to ask something of God and I've never received a whisper of a voice back. I've wanted to talk to my Dad, but have never heard any voices talking back. I would venture to say that if I had heard either, anyone upon hearing of that would think I'm 'mental' and suggest I see a psychiatrist, no? How about priests? They say they 'talk to God' and that God 'speaks' to them, but they never claim to have actually heard an actual voice. If all this time the real audio communication is only one-way, how is there any proof that anything is on the other side? 2. Sure, there are stories of miracles, but in your life or mine or anyone we know... When was the last time there has been an unequivical miracle happen that cannot be explained away as anything else but a miracle? 3. When people get a touchdown, they thank God. When they're rescued from a burning building, they thank God. When they're rescued from a pr