Skip to main content

Trends in Religiosity in America

Gallup started collecting data in 1948 relating to religious trends in the United States. In that year the percentage of Americans stating they are Protestants was 69%, Catholics made up 22%, and no religion was at 2%.

The high point in these studies for Protestants was in 1954 and 1956 when the percentage of Protestants reached 71%. The high point for Catholicism was in the 80's when it reached 28% and 29%. The Jewish populace has hovered pretty consistently between 2% and 4%. Mormonism wasn't really measured until the 80's and remains about 2%.

Skip ahead to 2016's figures. Protestants are down to 37%. Catholics remain at 22%. Jewish is at 3%, Mormonism is at 2%, and non-specific Christian at 10%. No religion is at 18%. So, while the number for Catholics, Jews, and Mormons has remained fairly stabled over the 60+ years, the two major trends is the decline of Protestantism down from 71% to 37%, and the rise of no religion from 2% to 18% It appears given this data that two-thirds of those siphoned off from Protestants go to no religion, and a third go to a non-specific Christian belief.

If you look more generally at the numbers, when you ask: 'How important is religion to your life?', (a question first posted in 1992), the trend shows that 'Not very Important' has risen from 12% to 25%. Since this is 25% of the total, it suggests that the trend from Protestantism to non-specific Christian to Atheism is likely to continue. It seems likely that those that have taken a step away from declaring they are Protestant are most likely to eventually move to some form of Agnosticism/Atheism.

If you ask: "Do you happen to be a member of a church/synagogue", the trends show a pattern.  In 1992 70% answered 'Yes', and 29% 'No'. By 2016 these numbers had changed to 55% for 'Yes' and 44% for 'No'.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eve Online - Faction Warfare Missioning

Basics: Gain ISK and LP by completing and turning in missions. Missions are against npc's (non-player "rats"). They generally involve destroying an object (like a reactor), or a head honcho rat (like a Sector Commander). With ISK you can purchase whatever you need off the Eve markets. LP you use to purchase items in your corporations Loyalty Points Store (LP = Loyalty Points). How lucrative is mission running? It depends on the tier the faction is at in the warzone. If you complete 20 missions, you should on average at Tier 3 get a payout of about 40 million ISK and 450K-550K LP. At about 700 ISK/LP that translates to about 350 mil. ISK. At Tier 4, those same missions completed should pay out 650k-850k LP. This would translate to about 550 mil. ISK. What do I use to run missions? Current doctrine suggests that if you're Amarr fighting against Minmatar, the best ship to use on Level 3 and 4 missions is a Stealth Bomber called the Hound . You can stay at range...

Draining the Swamp or Refilling It?

These are the current Trump Cabinet positions. Justice - Jeff Sessions Treasury - Steve Mnuchin Education - Betsy DeVos Transportation - Elaine Chao Health and Human Services - Tom Price Commerce - Wilbur Ross Housing and Urban Development - Ben Carson Defense - Gen. James Mattis I'm going to go through and describe both the good and bad of each choice. Foremost in mind will be the stated aim of Trump to 'Drain the Swamp'. Jeff Sessi ons  - Senator (Alabama):  C areer  in politics started in 1975 (Asst. US Attorney, Alabama). Reagan nominated him US Attorney for Alabama. Confirmed and held position for 12 years. Several allegations of racism dogged him over the years, highlighted by him calling the NAACP "un-American" and claiming civil rights did more harm than good " by trying to force civil rights "down the throats of people ". He has been Senator since 1996. He has the experience and expertise to head Justice, but his history in r...

The Pre-Pauline Creed

There are few Apologetics that have any meat on them. Most can be easily dismissed. One I rarely hear about is the Pre-Pauline Creed. The purpose seems to be to validate belief in an earthly Jesus and the Resurrection as an historical event by establishing that a creed was referred to by Paul going back to shortly after the Resurrection. I'm going to look at it and see for myself whether or not the Pre-Pauline Creed is a strong argument, or not. For me, it doesn't ultimately matter whether or not there was an early creed because all it could show is an early belief in the Resurrection, and not testify as to the truth behind those beliefs. However, I am curious as to what validity the creed has as part of an argument. The Background It is acknowledged that Paul wrote I Corinthians, which includes chapter 15, from which a Pre-Pauline Creed is extracted. I have only recently heard about this and while it has the feel of falseness like Isaiah 7:14, it's been around awhile. ...